Sometimes at work I need to match rows by a range, not by IDs. Example: putting students into GPA bands (like “Honors,” “Good Standing,” “Probation”). There’s no foreign key for that—the match is “does this GPA fall between the band’s min and max?”
English:
“Match each student to the GPA band whose range includes the student’s GPA.”
SQL:
My opinion of SQL & what trips me up
SQL feels like asking the database a question in a very exact way. I like that I can describe what I want and let the database figure out how to get it. It’s not “hard,” but it is picky—small details change the result.
What I still have to slow down for:
Turning English into steps. Questions like “students who never took course X” or “for each department, who has the top score?” make me pause and plan before I write the query.
Counting and then filtering. First you group and count, then (if needed) filter based on that count—easy to mix up the order.
Joins in general. Missing one condition can duplicate rows; adding the right condition fixes it.
NULLs. Equality doesn’t work the way you expect withNULL, so I double-check withIS NULLwhen needed.
Overall, I’m liking SQL more each week. Once I think in sets (tables in, table out), the patterns start to repeat and it gets much easier.
No comments:
Post a Comment